The Tell-Tale Heart Paper

After reading The tell-tale heart by Edgar Allen Poe, write and essay in which you use examples and details from the story to explain whether you think the narrator is telling the reader an accurate account of what is really happening as opposed to what he imagines is happening. The issue is if the narrator is reliable. Underline the thesis of your essay. 


writing 2 pages

i want original paper not copy paste from old work and no grammar errors. deliver a perfect paper.  PLEASE READ THE DOCUMENT ( don’t want lose any point)


eng315 week 3 professional experience 2

Due at the end of Week 3 (not eligible for late policy unless an approved documented exception provided).Follow the link above to the Word document titled “Wk3_FAQ.” 

Your Professional Experience assignment is to choose an unanswered frequently asked question from the Wk3_FAQ document. Next, provide the best answer possible (within 20-50 words), cite your source (APA style references page entry for outside source or in-text citation including page number for textbook) and put your name in the “Employee” section.  Finally, submit the answer to your chosen question in the Professional Experience #2 link from the Week 3 tab in Blackboard.

1. In order to receive credit for completing this task you must:

Choose an unanswered question (with an answer between 20-50 words; any source information does not count towards the word count) 

Provide a viable, complete answer (you must provide a link or other clear credit to the source)

Fill in the “Employee” section with your name

Submit your FAQ answer to the Week 3 Professional Experience #2 link in Blackboard

This is a pass/fail assignment.  All elements must be completed (simulating the workplace where incomplete work is unacceptable) for credit. You cannot receive partial credit. 

2. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Plan, create, and evaluate professional documents.

Write clearly, coherently, and persuasively using proper grammar, mechanics, and formatting appropriate to the situation.

Deliver professional information to various audiences using appropriate tone, style, and format.

Learn communication fundamentals and execute various professional tasks in a collaborative manner.

Analyze professional communication examples to assist in revision.



Module 2 – Discussion Memo: Rhetorical Reflection Memo – Instruction Manual    

Compose a memo (250 words) that clearly and concisely explains the following rhetorical considerations from your Instruction Manual project: 

•What is your purpose? 

•Who is your audience? 

•What kind and level of previous knowledge will your audience need to complete your task? 

•What kind of tools and/or materials will your audience need to complete your task?

Tebeaux, E., & Dragga, S. (2014). The essentials of technical communication (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199379996


Ashford 3: – Week 2 – Assignment

Ashford 3: – Week 2 – Assignment

Genres and Genre Film

After reviewing the discussion of genre in Chapter 4 of Film: From Watching to Seeing, demonstrate your understanding of one selected genre using a feature-length film.

Note: Several films are listed in Chapter 4 as emblematic of a specific genre. You are allowed to choose a film or genre not mentioned in Chapter 4, but you are strongly encouraged to email your professor to receive approval before doing so.

In 800 to 1200 words

·         Explain genre theory and, using Chapter 4 of the text as a reference, thoroughly describe the conventions and attributes of your selected genre.

·         Identify a feature-length film that fits this genre and provide a basic summary of the movie. As you develop this summary, remember the differences between a film’s story and a film’s plot and how these differences can lead to the inclusion of genre elements.

·         Interpret at least two genre conventions exhibited in your chosen feature-length film that help classify it in the selected genre. Be sure to provide a specific example of each convention (e.g., a particular scene or plot component).

·         Provide an example of a third convention from your chosen feature-length film and explain how this convention expands the boundaries of the specified genre.

Your paper should be organized around a thesis statement that focuses on how your chosen feature-length film both aligns with and expands upon your chosen genre.

The paper must be 800 to 1200 words in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the  Ashford Writing Center . Review the  Week Two sample paper , which provides an example of a well-developed analysis as well as insight on composition.

You must use at least two scholarly sources other than the textbook to support your claims. Refer to the  ENG225 Research Guide  in the Ashford University Library for guidance and to locate your sources. Cite your sources (including the feature-length film) within the text of your paper and on the reference page. For information regarding APA, including samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center.

Please note that if you opt to write about the same film in your Final Film Critique, applicable pieces of this assignment can be used to write that assignment. Please also note that you should reflect on and revise this assignment based on the instructor’s feedback before you incorporate it into the Final Film Critique.





Issues in International Policy discussion4

Issue Presented: The desired U.S. policy outcome with respect to Iran involves a stable country that (1) is an active participant in the world economy, including providing a stable source of oil production and supply; (2) does not threaten is neighbors, including Israel, Iraq, Yemen and Syria, either through its own actions, or the actions of affiliated non-state actors (like Hezbollah); and (3) does not possess a nuclear weapon.  The nuclear deal negotiated with Iran in 2015 was only intended to address one of those goals – ensuring that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons technology.

In May 2018, President Trump, who had called the deal historically bad on the campaign trail, announced that the United States was withdrawing from the conflict, despite pressure from European allies, as well as the Russian and Chinese governments to remain in the deal.  President Trump stated,

The agreement was so poorly negotiated that even if Iran fully complies, the regime can still be on the verge of a nuclear breakout in just a short period of time. The deal’s sunset provisions are totally unacceptable.

If I allowed this deal to stand, there would soon be a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Everyone would want their weapons ready by the time Iran had theirs.

Making matters worse, the deal’s inspection provisions lack adequate mechanisms to prevent, detect, and punish cheating and don’t even have the unqualified right to inspect many important locations, including military facilities. Not only does the deal fail to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but it also fails to address the regime’s development of ballistic missiles that could deliver nuclear warheads.

Finally, the deal does nothing to constrain Iran’s destabilizing activities, including its support for terrorism….

After these consultations, it is clear to me that we cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement. The Iran deal is defective at its core. If we do nothing, we know exactly what will happen. In just a short period of time, the world’s leading state sponsor of terror will be on the cusp of acquiring the world’s most dangerous weapons.

Therefore, I am announcing today that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.

Former President Barack Obama, in a rare statement on the policies of the Trump Administration, refuted President Trump’s claims:

There are few issues more important to the security of the United States than the potential spread of nuclear weapons, or the potential for even more destructive war in the Middle East. That’s why the United States negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in the first place.

The reality is clear. The JCPOA is working – that is a view shared by our European allies, independent experts, and the current U.S. Secretary of Defense. The JCPOA is in America’s interest – it has significantly rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. And the JCPOA is a model for what diplomacy can accomplish – its inspections and verification regime is precisely what the United States should be working to put in place with North Korea. Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy with North Korea to succeed, walking away from the JCPOA risks losing a deal that accomplishes – with Iran – the very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.

That is why today’s announcement is so misguided. Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated. In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration to the next. But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers.

  Do you agree with President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the JCPOA?  If so, how do you convince other allies to renegotiate the deal, particularly recalcitrant parties like China and Russia?  If you disagree with President Trump’s decision, how would you propose that the United States seek to confront aggressive Iranian behavior in places like Yemen and Syria?


In addressing this question, I expect you to engage in the policy analysis that we have been doing throughout the course. Reference the authors in your textbooks and supplemental readings where appropriate, and state your own position. You posting should be no less than 200 words.

Required Readings: Lecture Book, Chapter 6. Hill, Chapter 3.2, pp. 125-138. Annual Editions, pp 248-251.


IT Strategic Plan, Part 1

IT Strategic Plan, Part 1
Before you begin this assignment, be sure you have read the “Wobbly Wheels Case Study” and the  following chapters in the textbook: Chapters 8, 9, 12 and 14 (as assigned in class).
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply the course concepts to begin development of an  Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP) to support the strategic direction of Wobbly Wheels  Distribution Company (WW). This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes to  enable you to:
? identify, define, and explain the concepts of information technology governance and
management  IT Strategic Plan for Wobbly Wheels Distribution Company


Carol, the new CIO at WW, has asked you to write an IT Strategic Plan that she can use to guide the  direction for her organization. The ITSP will be developed in two parts. This assignment covers Part 1;  Part 2 will be covered in the next class assignment. Together, they will form an ITSP that has been  tailored to the course material covered in this class. You may work for an organization that has an ITSP,  and it would be a good idea for you to take a look at it, but it will likely be structured a little differently  from this one. Each organization develops an ITSP that will work for them.
You will develop Part 1 of the ITSP for Wobbly Wheels, using the outline below. Each of the topics to be  included in your outline is covered in the textbook readings assigned thus far; use the Index to locate  specific relevant portions of the text, and to locate additional ideas that may be included in chapters not  yet assigned. In addition to the course materials, at least one external resource (resource other than  those provided in the class) must be used. Two or more cited references will earn top credit. Use  a separate References page to list just the references you have cited. Remember to use the  APA formatting rules and correctly cite and reference your sources with APA format. Use the Grading  Rubric to be sure you have covered everything. Submit your paper as a Microsoft Word document, or a
document that can be read using Word, with your last name included in the filename.
Please use this outline to build your IT Strategic Plan. Use the numbering and headings shown below.
Part One
1. Business Statement – Summarize in one paragraph the business of WW. Refer to Case Study.
2. Business Strategic Objectives – From the information in the Case Study, list the three strategic  objectives. Next add a new strategic objective of your own – one that you consider important to  the current and future health of WW’s business. It should be a statement of how the  management team would improve the business of WW.
3. IT Vision and Mission Statement – Write one paragraph with a vision and mission statement for  the Information Technology Department at WW. Use what you learn from the case study to  create your own idea for the vision statement; and use the case study situation at WW to write  the mission statement for the IT department. Refer to Chapter 9, Step 2 “Define Your Future  Vision.” If you need help on a mission statement, do a little research on the web; you will find  many examples of IT mission statements.  3/29/2015 2
4. Governance – Using the textbook and the case study, describe in two or three paragraphs how  the IT governance process should work for WW. Carol wants to engage the other senior leaders, so include: who the participants are, what their roles are (why they are members of the  governance body), what governance methodology should be established, what responsibilities  the governance body would have, and how they would prioritize IT projects. Refer to the Table  of Contents for the textbook, and look in the Index under G – Governance for multiple resources  in the textbook.
5. Inventory of Current IT Projects – Using the information in the Case Study, you will use the table  provided to describe the current systems in use and the IT resources allocated to their support.
Copy and complete the table below, creating additional rows as needed to cover all current
systems at WW, then write a brief introductory paragraph to the table. The paragraph should
come first in your ITSP, to explain what the table is providing. Refer to the Index of the textbook,
I – IT Portfolio Management/Inventory of Projects.
Current System Function/
aligned to
The “right” and “wrong” answers have to do with whether or not you correctly incorporated the course
concepts from the textbook and addressed all parts of the assignment. You need to do some external
research on at least one aspect of the assignment – your choice – and incorporate it and cite/reference it
in APA format in your response. The content of the mission and vision statements you create is not as
important as that it makes sense in light of the course content and the Case Study. Use the Rubric below
to be sure you have covered all aspects of the assignment.

using this case study:


analyze poem

 Analyze The Misfit’s characters in “A Good Man is Hard to Find” . Does he have any redeeming qualities or potential for good? What in his life history is he unsure about and unable to resolve? Consider the conversation between The Misfi and the grandmother near the end of the story. Could their final interaction, despite its tragic ending, possibly be the beginning of a turning point in his life? What do you think the grandmother means in her brief “moment of clarity “ when she says to The Misfi, “why you‘re one of my babies. You’re one of my own children?” Why do you think he responds as he does when she reaches out and touches him? 


week9 enf



instructions – one page


Assignment 5: “Sample Instructions – Draft”

Pick a favorite snack food that requires you to take at least eight steps to prepare.

Write one to two (1-2) pages of instructions on how to fix the snack you picked. Imagine your audience is third grade Girl Scouts who have little or no experience in a kitchen. Along with your instructions (in the same document), write a 1-page explanation of the steps you took to create the document and the rationale for your approach. In your document, you should: Write instructions and explanations clearly and briefly. Use appropriate tone and language for the intended purpose and audience. Organize the instructions and the document. Provide an explanation and rationale of the approach. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.